FTA - DSSRookie Forum   VIP Membership get lots of benefits

Go Back   FTA - DSSRookie Forum > WELCOME To DSS Rookie > Legal Issues


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2009, 04:48 PM
voop's Avatar
Active Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: west side
Posts: 46
Thanks: 30
Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by signalsnatcher33 View Post
We both know that when you decrypt a signal intended for paying customers like D/N's signal, without their permission that we are stealing...... Same as when you climb a pole (on your property) and hook yourself to cable without paying, rig your electric or water meter to show less than actually used it is "Theft of services" or it is here in the states anyway........ I know from experience.
That pole analogy is interesting...except that the pole is always the power company's property or phone company's property no matter where it is located...Whereas my roof is my property.

-Voop

Last edited by voop; 07-28-2009 at 04:51 PM. Reason: added word
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to voop For This Useful Post:
smokymtn (07-28-2009)
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2009, 04:55 PM
signalsnatcher33's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sitting high, looking low
Posts: 2,628
Thanks: 272
Thanked 491 Times in 282 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by smokymtn View Post
I don't think it stealing only finding away around the system,
Yep, to each his own. Whatever lets you sleep at night I suppose.

Me personally, I know what I do and accept responsibility for my actions..... If it was legal, it would not be any fun. Imho

Later

Quote:
Originally Posted by voop View Post
That pole analogy is interesting...except that the pole is always the power company's property or phone company's property no matter where it is located...Whereas my roof is my property.

-Voop
Who owns the rights on the signal? Who owns that encryption system? Can you tap into the city's water line running under your property and get free water?

Calling a chicken a duck, will not make the chicken a duck. No matter how loud or how often you say it.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Please DO NOT pm Mods for support!

Post ALL Support questions in the forums for all members to benefit.
Support questions in PMs will NOT be answered!
click here for
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to signalsnatcher33 For This Useful Post:
sodusme (07-28-2009)
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2009, 04:58 PM
smokymtn's Avatar
Staying ahead of AID
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Was there; Now Here
Posts: 1,770
Thanks: 76
Thanked 61 Times in 45 Posts
I subscribe tv and test fta, and I also responsible for my actions everyday that I get up
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2009, 05:00 PM
Blinky123's Avatar
I Love Plastic Mod
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Plastic Place
Posts: 3,917
Thanks: 462
Thanked 1,141 Times in 435 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by smokymtn View Post
I subscribe tv and test fta, and I also responsible for my actions everyday that I get up
At my age I just thank God that I get up everyday. LMAO
__________________
Want a VIP Membership??? Click here -->

DO NOT PM the MODs and ADMINs for support!

Post ALL Support questions in the forums for all members to benefit.
Support questions in PMs will NOT be answered!
Click here for Rules!!!
Before you post a question that has already been asked - click here for Search!!!
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Blinky123 For This Useful Post:
callyann (08-23-2009), d69j (07-29-2009), frizzle (07-28-2009), smokymtn (07-28-2009), wrangler (07-29-2009)
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2009, 05:05 PM
smokymtn's Avatar
Staying ahead of AID
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Was there; Now Here
Posts: 1,770
Thanks: 76
Thanked 61 Times in 45 Posts
Thats why I say its a thin line or things would be a lot different
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2009, 05:11 PM
signalsnatcher33's Avatar
Moderator
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sitting high, looking low
Posts: 2,628
Thanks: 272
Thanked 491 Times in 282 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by smokymtn View Post
Thats why I say its a thin line or things would be a lot different
It only gets thin when people do not want to say that they are using something that does not belong to them without paying for it.....

I am done now..... Lol, I quit. I shall not stir the pot anymore.

Later
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Please DO NOT pm Mods for support!

Post ALL Support questions in the forums for all members to benefit.
Support questions in PMs will NOT be answered!
click here for
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2009, 05:20 PM
dayglo77's Avatar
Going Strong Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: knee deep in sh*t
Posts: 99
Thanks: 15
Thanked 33 Times in 19 Posts
so i guess that anything that happens to end up on your property, automatically gives you legal ownership and the right to do as you please?
i would think not
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2009, 05:28 PM
smokymtn's Avatar
Staying ahead of AID
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Was there; Now Here
Posts: 1,770
Thanks: 76
Thanked 61 Times in 45 Posts
You cant stir whats not there,
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2009, 05:34 PM
voop's Avatar
Active Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: west side
Posts: 46
Thanks: 30
Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by signalsnatcher33 View Post
Yep, to each his own. Whatever lets you sleep at night I suppose.

Me personally, I know what I do and accept responsibility for my actions..... If it was legal, it would not be any fun. Imho

Later



Who owns the rights on the signal? Who owns that encryption system? Can you tap into the city's water line running under your property and get free water?

Calling a chicken a duck, will not make the chicken a duck. No matter how loud or how often you say it.

You know what...darnit heck...I'm thinkn you are correct although I think the real property law of the air above...may throw a cloud of doubt on the actual enforcement of what is the amendment of the Communications act of 1934...declaring that all air signals belong to no one...Here below is the amendment fought hard to pass by Barry Goldwater in the passing of the 1984 Communications act here below:
=Voop

SEC. 5. UNAUTHORIZED RECEPTION OF CERTAIN COMMUNICATIONS.

(a) Section 705 of the Communications Act of 1934 (as redesignated by section 6) is amended by inserting ``(a)´´ after the section designation and by adding at the end thereof the following new subsections:

``(b) The provisions of subsection (a) shall not apply to the interception or receipt by any individual, or the assisting (including the manufacture or sale) of such interception or receipt, of any satellite cable programming for private viewing if—

``(1) the programming involved is not encrypted; and
``(2)(A) a marketing system is not established under which—

``(i) an agent or agents have been lawfully designated for the purpose of authorizing private viewing by individuals, and
``(ii) such authorization is available to the individual involved from the appropriate agent or agents; or

``(B) a marketing system described in subparagraph (A) is established and 'the individuals receiving such programming has obtained authorization for private viewing under that system.

``(c) For purposes of this section—

``(1) the term 'satellite cable programming' means video programming which is transmitted via satellite and which is primarily intended for the direct receipt by cable operators for their retransmission to cable subscribers;
``(2) the term 'agent', with respect to any person, includes an employee of such person;
``(3) the term 'encrypt', when used with respect to satellite cable programming, means to transmit such programming in a form whereby the aural and visual characteristics (or both) are modified or altered for the purpose of preventing the unauthorized receipt of such programming by persons without authorized equipment which is designed to eliminate the effects of such modification or alteration;
``(4) the term 'private viewing' means the viewing for private use in an individual's dwelling unit by means of equipment, owned or operated by such individual, capable of receiving satellite cable programming directly from a satellite; and
``(5) the term 'private financial gain' shall not include the gain resulting to any individual for the private use in such individual's dwelling unit of any programming for which the individual has not obtained authorization for that use.

``(d)(1) Any person who 'willfully violates subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned for not more than 6 months, or both.

``(2) Any person who violates subsection (a) willfully and for purposes of direct or indirect commercial advantage or private financial gain shall be fined not more than $25,000 or imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or both, for the first such conviction and shall be fined not more than $50,000 or imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both,: for any subsequent conviction.
``(3)(A) Any person aggrieved by any violation of subsection (a) may bring a civil action in a United States district court or in any other court of competent jurisdiction.

``(B) The court may—

``(i) grant temporary and final injunctions on such terms as it may deem reasonable to prevent or restrain violations of subsection (a);
``(ii) award damages as described in subparagraph (C); and
``(iii) direct the recovery of full costs, including awarding reasonable attorneys' fees to an aggrieved party who prevails.

``(C)(i) Damages awarded by any court under this section shall be computed, at the election of the aggrieved party, in accordance with either of the following subclauses;

``(I) the party aggrieved may recover the actual damages suffered by him as a result of the violation and any profits of the violator that are attributable to the violation which are not taken into account in computing the actual damages; in determining the violator's profits, the party aggrieved shall be required to prove only the violator's gross revenue, and the violator shall be required to prove his deductible expenses and the elements of profit attributable to factors other than the violation; or
``(II) the party aggrieved may recover an award of statutory damages for each violation involved in the action in a sum of not less than $250 or more than $10,000, as the court considers just.

``(ii) In any case in which the court finds that the violation was committed willfully and for purposes of direct or indirect commercial advantage or private financial gain, the court in its discretion may increase the award of damages, whether actual or statutory, by an amount of not more than $50,000.
``(iii) In any case where the court finds that the violator was not aware and had no reason to believe that his acts constituted a violation of this section, the court in its discretion may reduce the award of damages to a sum of not less than $100.

``(4) The importation, manufacture, sale, or distribution of equipment by any person with the intent of its use to assist in any activity prohibited by subsection (a) shall be subject to penalties and remedies under this subsection to the same extent and in the same manner as a person who has engaged in such prohibited activity.
``(5) The penalties under this subsection shall be in addition to those prescribed under any other provision of this title.
``(6) Nothing in this subsection shall prevent any State, or political subdivision thereof, from enacting or enforcing any laws with respect to the importation, sale, manufacture, or distribution of equipment by any person with the intent of its use to assist in the interception or receipt of radio communications prohibited by subsection (a).

``(e) Nothing in this section shall affect any right, obligation, or liability under title 17, United States Code, any rule, regulation, or order thereunder, or any other applicable Federal, State, or local law.´´.

(b) The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the effective date of this Act.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2009, 05:44 PM
smokymtn's Avatar
Staying ahead of AID
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Was there; Now Here
Posts: 1,770
Thanks: 76
Thanked 61 Times in 45 Posts
Thats good article for cable
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to smokymtn For This Useful Post:
voop (07-28-2009)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
just a thought --- a wish nickdish SONICVIEW Discussion 6 03-16-2009 12:42 PM
Just a Thought Dougout Forum Suggestions - ONLY 3 09-03-2008 04:49 PM
Just a thought whiskeyriver VIEWSAT Discussion 1 03-27-2008 11:31 AM
Just a THOUGHT newyorkrookie4356 FTA General Discussion 4 03-01-2008 02:12 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
DSSrookie FTA Forums