using n2edit 2.58 on a 102 image I noticed the data header info doesn't match what the author says.Was this a bug in the version?What he calls time stamp/status is actually the provider id or part of the id.
01 is actually the 01 from the provider id and 01 01 what he calls timestamp/ status is actually provider id 01 01
0C 00 06 1B 1B 06 00 00 00 01 01 0000
provider id in this case would be the 0000 according to n2edit which I know isn't so.